Narrative by Design

The Problem

Ask a student "tell me about yourself" and you get one of two things: a chronological list of everything they've done, or a rehearsed script that sounds like everyone else. Neither works. The list is too long and has no center. The script has no life in it. Both miss the point — which is to say something true about who you are and what drives you, in a way that actually lands.

The gap isn't missing experience. Students have plenty. The problem is that nobody teaches them how to look at their experience, find the thread running through it, and compress it into something clear. Career services gives them resume templates and interview scripts. What they need is a method for figuring out what their story actually is — before they try to tell it.

To be clear about what this isn't: Narrative by Design is not a resume-polishing session. It's not an interview script workshop. It's not a program that forces students to choose a major or career path in one sitting. It's a repeatable framework — something students can return to as their experiences and goals change.

What We Built

Narrative by Design is a 90-minute facilitated workshop built around one core idea: narrative compression. Students start with a messy, unfiltered paragraph about who they are. Then they cut it to a sentence. Then a single word. Each compression forces a choice — what you keep and what you drop tells you what actually matters.

The workshop pairs this compression exercise with structured reflection tools — card sorts for values, strengths, and skills — that ground the narrative in evidence rather than aspiration. A companion web app (ccd-nbd.vercel.app) guides students through each phase and provides a space to do the work.

narrative compression

Paragraph to sentence to one word. Each cut forces prioritization. The word isn't a brand or a permanent label — it's a decision tool. A temporary center that helps you figure out what to emphasize and what to leave out.

grounding in evidence

Card sorts adapted from Knowdell Career Values, CliftonStrengths, and Motivated Skills. Students select their top values, strengths, and skills — then compare what they chose with what their resume actually shows.

digital companion

A five-phase web tool (Intake, Resume, Categorize, Rewrite, Reflect) that walks students through the full process. Upload a resume, do the compression, sort cards, and rewrite — all in one session.

The Method

The workshop moves through five phases. Each one builds on the last.

1. Brain dump

Write a 90-second unfiltered paragraph answering "tell me about yourself." No editing, no polishing. Students write the way they'd actually talk if someone asked them at a coffee shop. This raw material is where everything starts.

2. Compress

Cut the paragraph to one sentence. Then cut the sentence to one word. No job titles, no broad traits like "smart" or "hardworking." The word has to name a motivational value — something specific to you. Students who land on "Builder" or "Connector" or "Catalyst" are getting somewhere. Students who land on "Leader" usually need another pass.

3. Ground it

Card sorting exercises adapted from established instruments: Knowdell Career Values (what matters to you?), CliftonStrengths (how do you naturally operate?), and Motivated Skills (what energizes you?). Students pick their top two in each category. This is the reality check — does what you think about yourself match what your choices and resume actually show?

4. Test it

An AI layer in the web app analyzes the student's original paragraph, card sort selections, and resume to suggest an alternative word. Sometimes it confirms what the student chose. Sometimes it points somewhere different — a student who picked "Creator" might get back "Organizer" because that's what their resume actually shows. That tension between self-perception and evidence is where the most productive conversations happen. The AI suggestion isn't a correction — it's a mirror.

5. Rewrite

With all of this in hand, students rewrite their original paragraph. The rule: your response should not be a direct copy of the AI examples — it should be inspired by them. Students use the AI output as a starting point, not a finished product. The new paragraph is shorter, clearer, and grounded in what they've just learned about themselves. It has a center. It knows what it's about.

Two Audiences, Two Outcomes

The process is the same for everyone. The outcomes are different depending on where students are.

upperclassmen (2nd–4th year)

Students with internships, projects, and a general sense of direction. Their problem isn't a lack of experience — it's deciding what matters most and how to present it clearly. The workshop works as a communication tool. The one word functions as a brand anchor that organizes experience.

first-years / direction-uncertain

Students who feel uncertain, overwhelmed, or pressured to "figure things out." The workshop works as a sense-making tool. The one word is a working hypothesis — not a permanent identity — that guides reflection and helps them figure out what to explore next.

Core problem

Upperclassmen: too many experiences, unclear emphasis. First-years: too much uncertainty, unclear signals.

What the word does

For upperclassmen, it's a brand anchor that organizes experience. For first-years, it's a working hypothesis that guides reflection.

Emotional outcome

Upperclassmen leave with confidence and control. First-years leave with relief and reassurance.

Practical outcome

Upperclassmen get stronger interview and networking answers. First-years get clearer next steps and a willingness to experiment.

Key shift

Upperclassmen: "I know what to emphasize." First-years: "I don't need to have it all figured out yet."

What We Learned

Three things from building and testing this workshop that changed how we think about narrative-based career tools:

Compression works better than expansion

Students who started with a long paragraph and cut it down produced clearer, more personal results than students who tried to build up from nothing. Starting with too much and carving away is easier than starting from a blank page. The cutting is where the thinking happens.

The gap between self-perception and evidence is productive

When a student picks "Creator" as their word but their resume is full of management and coordination, that mismatch doesn't mean they're wrong. It means there's something to talk about. The most useful moments in the workshop come when what students believe about themselves doesn't quite line up with the evidence — and they have to figure out why.

Hands-on and digital together

The card sorting works best as a physical activity — picking up cards, moving them around, holding them. The compression and rewriting work best on screen, where students can see their drafts side by side. The workshop uses both because neither format does everything well on its own.

How We Measure It

We evaluate the workshop not by general satisfaction but by developmentally aligned outcomes — different questions for each group.

upperclassmen indicators

Greater confidence in deciding what to emphasize. Less need to over-explain. Increased clarity in professional conversations. Sample prompt: "I feel more confident deciding what to emphasize when talking about my experiences."

first-year indicators

Reduced anxiety about not having a clear direction. Increased comfort describing themselves honestly. Clearer sense of what to explore next. Sample prompt: "I feel less pressure to have my future fully figured out right now."

Student Feedback

Students who went through the workshop reported better understanding of what they care about and how to communicate it. Two quotes that came up repeatedly in testing:

"I now know how to better communicate my skills and experiences to a recruiter."

"I feel like I have a better understanding of what I care about and the kind of roles I'm looking for."

What worked

The mix of hands-on card activities and digital exercises. Students liked the immediate feedback from the compression stages and preferred small groups (five students or fewer). A conversational, dialogue-based approach worked better than anything that felt like a lecture.

What changed

The first version of the facilitation script was rigid and didn't match the tone of the web tool. We rewrote it to be more conversational and gave facilitators room to adapt based on the group. That flexibility is now built into the design — the script is a template, not a requirement.

Where It Stands

Narrative by Design is currently in pilot at Dartmouth's Center for Career Design. Spring 2026 is focused on testing with participants outside the center to refine the format. By fall 2026, the plan is to launch it as a regular offering — available as one-on-one appointments with Career Design Lab interns or small group workshops. Longer term, we're working on making the program scalable: training facilitators to run it for student clubs and outside organizations.

The web companion is live at ccd-nbd.vercel.app.

Related Work

Career Design Lab

The semester-long program where Narrative by Design sits alongside other reflection tools. The compression method grew out of the Pattern Distillation exercise used there.

DartWorld

The reflective platform where students explore careers and journal over time. Narrative by Design addresses the same question from the other direction — not "what's out there" but "what's your story."

Synapse

The spatial career map. Students who've done Narrative by Design first tend to use Synapse more deliberately — they know what they're looking for.

Interested in running Narrative by Design at your institution?

Get in touch Back to all work